"Vaccine" Toxicity Diagnostics
One of the “roadblocks” that we have been experiencing while trying to piece together medical and healing solutions for the vaxxed is the lack of proper diagnostic testing geared toward assessing vaxx toxicity. Diagnostics are essential to this process to: (a) determine the question of placebo vs. toxic dose for any given individual; (b) detect any latent or as-of-yet undetected disease symptomology; (c) give the patient and providers a general indication as to the overall vaxx toxicity level within any patient’s system; (d) indicate specific treatment directions and/or protocols based on a given individual’s toxicity mix. It would be helpful as well to aggregate this data so that we can begin to get a bigger picture of the “percentage of placebos” question for specified populations.
Dr. Robert O. Young’s microscopy study (linked in the post “Trust the Science Against COVID ‘Vaccines’” on this very COV+VAX blog!) has yielded the most comprehensive picture to date of what is contained within the vials. This gives us insight into the “chimeric poison,” which will undoubtedly require chimeric solutions for each victim. The light-bulb that went off in my head last week was that we will therefore require a chimeric diagnostic procedure as well. Here is what I have so far in the way of specific diagnostic tests that are already available and can give an individual a composite picture of the level and specific forms/ratios of toxicity within the given individual:
(1) D-Dimer Blood Clotting Test
Dr. Charles Hoffe is one of the first practicing doctors to observe vaxx toxicity directly in his patients and step up as a whistle-blower. Noticing a trend in clotting among the vaxxed, Dr. Hoffe started ordering D-Dimer Blood Clotting tests for all of his injected patients, finding that 62% test positive for active clotting. Patients have manifested acute clotting as well as pervasive microclotting, the aggregate effect of which can also be measured in terms of intensity via the D-Dimer test. Especially if you have health insurance, it would be best to have a competent doctor order your D-Dimer test and review the results with you in treatment. However, if this is not possible, one can also order a test online and send your blood samples into the lab for review. They run kind pricey ($300 is about average from what I can tell), but here is the cheapest one I could find.[1] The link contains sample versions of the test results with a description of how to read/interpret them.
I consider the D-Dimer necessary for all vaxxed patients because the clotting issue is progressive and life-threatening. I think repeat tests every 3-6 months are advisable for about a year, after which you can safely assume you are in the 38% who do not manifest that issue. This is subject to your individual health levels and any predispositions toward clotting, of course; consult a competent cardiologist for a recommendation specific to your situation.
The D-Dimer can also serve as a very imperfect proxy for vaxx toxicity. Before Dr. Young’s study was published, it was in fact the only confirmed diagnostic proxy that we had. The intensity of the clotting issue within the patient who tests positive may give him/her insight into the degree or progression of vaxx toxicity within the system. To that end, those who test positive will need repeated D-Dimer tests to either monitor progression of the disease or evaluate treatment efficacy, as the case may be.
(2) Heavy Metal Blood Testing
We have known that heavy metals are included in “vaccines” and Big Pharma injections of all varieties for some time now. However, Dr. Young’s study is helpful in revealing to us precisely which metals are contained within each of the major brands of bioweapon vials distributed in the United States. Here is a breakdown of the specific heavy metals found within each brand according to Dr. Young:
Pfizer: Chromium, Aluminum, Bismuth, Copper, Titanium, Vanadium, Iron, Silicon
AstraZeneca: Iron, Chromium, Nickel
Johnson & Johnson: Iron, Chromium, Nickel
Moderna: Aluminum, Copper, Iron, Silicon, Lead, Cadmium, Selenium
Therefore, heavy metal blood testing is the most effective way of addressing this aspect of toxicity contained within the injections. The most commonly tested heavy metals are also the ones most widely recognized as toxic to the body: Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Some heavy metal panels include Aluminum as well. As you can see from Dr. Young’s results, your typical/standard heavy metal blood testing panel is unlikely to accurately and comprehensively assess heavy metal toxicity for any of the brands, with Moderna being the only one for which you could use the standard panel as a proxy, as it addresses Lead and Cadmium. However, it should be noted that as these vials are being distributed under Emergency Use Authorization, the manufacturers are under no obligation to keep their formulas consistent. Therefore, not all “Pfizer vaccines” are necessarily created equal – vials in Brazil may be quite different than vials in Alabama. The same principle applies to time as well as space – a February 2021 Moderna injection may be different than the August 2021 version. These are known unknowns, from our vantage point.
The best way to go would be to work with an Integrative doctor or another doctor who can order a heavy metals blood panel for you and add specific metals to the testing order. This yields the best chance for insurance coverage, and it also could potentially give you a comprehensive overview of vaxx-related heavy metal toxicity all within one process rather than having to do separate tests for separate elements. Because of the emergency use aspect above which does not require all injections under the same brand-name to be identical, I personally would request a panel of “all of the above” heavy metals. In other words, I would request a heavy metals blood panel to include: Chromium, Aluminum, Bismuth, Copper, Titanium, Vanadium, Iron, Silicon, Nickel, Lead, Cadmium, and Selenium.
In fact, the truth is, heavy metals are everywhere in our environment, from chem trails to Chick-fil-A nugget breading. So, even as an unvaxxed person, I plan to request a heavy metals panel during my next appointment with my Integrative doctor, which happens to be tomorrow as of this writing. If you have to be more DIY about it, here is a website where you can order either a standard panel or element-specific testing: https://www.healthtestingcenters.com/heavy-metals-and-toxin-testing/. The only heavy metals found by Dr. Young that cannot be tested through the single-element resources listed here are Bismuth, Vanadium, Iron, and Silicon. I will keep my eyes peeled for testing options for these and update this blog if I find them. Also: by all means, scroll to the bottom of that page beneath the testing products and read their very informative and to-the-point explanation of heavy metal toxicity and testing.
(3) Assessing Graphene Oxide Toxicity
This warrants a separate discussion from other heavy metals because graphene behaves quite differently within the system and does not generally show up on normal heavy metal blood tests. The graphene as well is perhaps the most urgently dangerous poison within the injection cocktails, and so the relative lack of established diagnostic assessments is of great concern. Still, there are ways of observing and approximating graphene toxicity, and there are also ways of directly assessing it via electron microscopy.
Ricardo Delgado, Director of La Quinta Columna research group in Spain—which may have been the first group to reveal the presence of graphene oxide in the vials—explains the blood testing procedure that can detect graphene in the system as follows: “If we extract a little bit of blood from the inoculation area, and that's from a recent inoculation —for example, once three weeks have already passed and the substance has flowed through the body—and that sample is centrifuged, properly cleaned, and put under the optical and electron microscope, there you should be able to see the classic graphene meshes. That's a sure thing. Moreover, they're unmistakable.” (Translated from Spanish by Orwell.city: https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/graphene-and-blood-tests.html.
Dr. José Luis Sevillano, also of La Quinta Columna, confirmed this procedure, but also indicated that doctors can perform patient anamnesis interviews; magneticism testing of the injection site, upper thorax, and back; and perform the D-Dimer test to assess graphene toxicity. The graphene is believed to be the primary source of the clotting found by Dr. Charles Hoffe and others, as the immune system attacks the large graphene-containing nanoparticulates, creating coagulation. The higher the D-Dimer result, the more graphene oxide is likely to be in your system. Here is the Orwell.city article, with translations of the interview with Dr. Sevillano: https://www.orwell.city/2021/09/graphene-oxide-in-the-blood.html.
Unfortunately, we do not as of yet have commercial labs in the United States that have stepped forward to offer graphene testing via the centrifuge / electron microscopy procedure described above by Ricardo Delagado. Once we have that, there will be no need for proxy tests and analyses. Consider this a call to action – brave Patriots in the medical testing industry need to step forward to develop and offer these services. Publish and distribute your procedures for free so that others can adopt them. Offer decently affordable out-of-pocket rates in case insurance companies try to block it. This doesn’t get fixed unless or until we all stand up to play our parts.
(4) Spike Protein Titers Testing
As we now know, the spike protein is cytotoxic, and/or an indication of cytotoxicity in the system. Briefly, I will mention here that Dr. Robert O. Young of the primary research study that contributes to this very piece disagrees with the mainstream narrative about the “spike protein.” Dr. Young does not believe in a separate spike protein entity produced by a coronavirus and included within the inoculations, but rather describes a “corona effect” or a “spiked protein” effect created via rote cellular damage. Dr. Young believes that the nanotech particulates in the injections puncture and injure cells in their attempt to insert toxic mRNA into the cells for replication. This in turn warps proteins within the cell, ultimately leading to cellular death in a process that resembles a spiky implosion.
I will admit that I am more partial to Dr. Young’s interpretation than the mainstream narrative. This is because Dr. Young’s “outfection” theory of disease resonates with Dr. Sebi’s teachings about the nature of disease, and those of other advanced and successful healers from various non-Western/non-corporate traditions. I would present to you that both Dr. Young and Dr. Sebi have produced superior curative protocols for diseases such as cancer and HIV/AIDS. Dr. Sebi was once sued for claiming he could cure HIV/AIDS, and won his case because he was able to demonstrate conclusively to the satisfaction of the court that he in fact could. If their methods of curing disease are superior to those of mainstream/allopathic medicine, then it would follow that their model of disease is superior as well.
Nevertheless, I am of the mindset that spike protein titers testing may in fact be a super-accessible and valid testing procedure to measure overall vaxx toxicity. The people making the tests and performing them do not have to know what the spike truly is in order to recognize it and assess its concentration in the system. Because of economic incentives, these testing procedures are widely available and should be easy to access via physician care without controversy—or without revealing your true reason for wanting the test, for that matter. If you subscribe to Dr. Young’s perspective, what you are actually measuring here is the level of concentrated cellular death within the system.
Here is a company that makes spike protein titers tests.[2] As you can tell, capitalism is alive and well in the era of corona vaxx mass medical genocidal terrorism.
(5) Blood Smears for Parasite Testing
Dr. Young found the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi in the Pfizer injections, a parasite commonly associated with Chagas Disease and AIDS. Reviewing the Mayo Clinic’s explanation of Chagas Disease, several symptoms of acute Chagas Disease pop out as observable within vaxx-ill individuals, including: fever, fatigue, body aches, headache, loss of appetite, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Chronic Chagas Disease symptoms are more concerning and have also been observed within the vaxxed: irregular heartbeat, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.
Because this parasite is already known to the mainstream medical community, it is simple to get tested for it. You can ask your doctor for a parasite blood smear test, specifying that you would like to be tested for Chagas Disease in particular. They may try to funnel you toward PCR testing for this, but I would not submit to that. It is better to know for certain, and a full smear can yield the added benefit of detecting additional parasites if there are any in your system for other reasons.
Pursuant to the discussion above about Emergency Use Authorization, I would not assume any of the following: (a) that all Pfizer injections contain T. cruzi; (b) that other brand-name injections are guaranteed NOT to have T. cruzi; (c) that T. cruzi is and forever will be the only parasite included within the injections. My recommendation is that anyone who took Pfizer needs to get a parasite smear/Chagas Disease test ASAP. Regarding those who took the poison under a different brand-name, I would say to get the test if you manifest symptoms similar to Chagas Disease. Disease is often multi-factorial, and so I would not rest on the assumption that other explanations for these symptoms are sufficient to rule out the possible presence of T. cruzi. Also, this matter is urgent, because Chagas Disease progresses “beyond a point of no return” into a chronic illness (according to mainstream medicine—take it seriously, but not obsessively so, as we are proving more and more of their lies daily).
(6) Aura Spectrography
This is the only vaxx toxicity assessment procedure that I, personally, have participated in. Aura Spectrography can be useful for measuring the frequency resonance of the individual and producing a spectrograph image of the individual’s unique aura. This aura image will be a composite of several colors, each of which corresponds to particular energetic aspects that can be qualitatively assessed to produce an overview of the individuals energy and frequency healing needs.
The reason why this tool is useful for assessing vaxx toxicity is because fully vaxxed individuals present with an all-grey or basically absent aura. This is likely due to two reasons: (a) the overall toxicity of the injections is draining to the individual’s life-force energy, depleting the ability to produce and project a healthy aura; and (b) frequency interference from 5G towers and other frequency weaponry interfere with the aura itself, creating gaps and “holes” within the aura. Aura spectrographs can therefore give the patient an idea of the extent to which frequency poisoning is affecting them in real-time, and a visual representation of “how much life force energy” they have or do not have.
As researchers from La Quinta Columna have indicated, it appears that the body naturally eliminates graphene over time—and this likely accounts for the “booster” pushes worldwide. This stands to reason, as the body naturally produces glutathione, which is known to break down and help eliminate the graphene. Some have stated that it may take up to a year per injection to eliminate the graphene entirely. Aura spectrography can give the individual an idea as to the levels of graphene in the system, as this is believed to be the primary mechanism of energetic/frequency disturbance within the vaxxed. A normal, healthy aura within a “fully vaxxed” individual could indicate one or more of the following: (a) reduced or eliminated graphene oxide if within 6-12 months for single-jabbed or 12-24 months for double-jabbed; (b) shut off 5G towers; (c) frequency weaponry in the region captured and redirected to positive frequencies; (d) vaxx victim received a placebo in this case.
I refer you to Quantum Nurse Klanmother Karen-ann Lucyk Macdonald for a demonstration of the utilization of aura spectrography to assess vaxx or contact-vaxx damage: https://www.brighteon.com/c6beeda3-7c01-4945-88df-51c638455feb.
Links: